|












|
The History Problem in Lesbian and Gay
Studies
Professor David Robinson
Office:
Modern Languages 492 English 596G Phone: 520-621-7395 Tue. 5:30-8:00
email: dmrobins@u.arizona.edu Modern Languages Rm. 312 Office hours: W
3-4; Th 11-12
Required Texts:
Bernadette Brooten,
Love Between Women James Creech, Closet Writing/Gay Reading Michel
Foucault, The History of Sexuality, Volume 1 David Halperin, One
Hundred Years of Homosexuality Rictor Norton, The Myth of the Modern
Homosexual Edward Stein, ed., Forms of Desire Thomas Laquer, Making
Sex
Course Description:
In this course, we will
investigate what is, arguably, the most serious, indeed fundamental divide
in the field(s) of Lesbian & Gay Studies/Sexuality Studies/Queer
Theory: the question of whether the object of study within these fields is
a recent "invention," or whether it (whether homosexuality, male
homosexuality, lesbianism, and/or sexuality) can legitimately be
considered transhistorically. Many graduate students will be familiar, at
least to some degree, with Michel Foucault's History of Sexuality, Volume
1, as well as, perhaps, David Halperin's One Hundred Years of
Homosexuality, both of which espouse what might be called a hard-line
social constructionist approach to this issue, contending that the
concepts "homosexuality" and "sexuality" are modern inventions. Students
might also be somewhat familiar with the work of John Boswell, widely
considered an essentialist, and the most prominent critic (and target) of
social constructionists. We will read all three of these
historians/critics, as well as many others, in an attempt to understand
the nuances of this often bitter, and even more often misunderstood,
debate. Readings will include theoretical essays on the
essentialist-constructionist debate, and on the practice of
lesbian/gay/queer history more generally; essays examining issues and
texts within particular historical periods, including Classical Antiquity,
the Middle Ages, the Renaissance, the Eighteenth Century, and the
Nineteenth Century; as well as two primary texts from the Eighteenth
Century.
One
paper (approx. 15 pages) will be required. Your grade for the course will
be based on your grade on the paper, adjusted either up or down depending
on your level of participation in the class throughout the
semester.
August
Week 1
Tu 22 Course Introduction
__________ Week 2
Tu 29 Foucault, The History of Sexuality,
Volume 1
September __________ Week 3
Tu 5 Michel
Foucault, Introduction to The Uses of Pleasure Eve Sedgwick, “Paranoid
Reading, Reparative Reading” (from Novel Gazing) John Boswell,
“Revolutions, Universals, and Sexual Categories” Ed Stein, Forms of
Desire: McIntosh, “The Homosexual Role” Boswell, “Concepts,
Experience, and Sexuality” Weinrich, “Reality or Soxial
Construction?” Dynes, “Wrestling with the Social Boa
Constructor” Stein, “Conclusion” __________ Week 4
Tu 12
David Halperin, “One Hundred Years of Homosexuality” Halperin,
“Historicizing the Sexual Body” (CR) Halperin, “Two Views of Greek
Love” Adrienne Rich, “Compulsory Heterosexuality and Lesbian
Existence” __________ Week 5
Tu 19 Abdul JanMohamed,
“Sexuality on/of the Racial Border” Catherine MacKinnon, “Does
Sexuality Have a History?” Amy Richlin, “Not Before Homosexuality”
Craig Williams, “Greek Love at Rome” Jonathan Walters, “Invading
the Roman Body” _________ Week 6
Tu 26 Bernadette Brooten,
Love Between Women “Lesbian Historiography Before the Name?” (GLQ
dossier on Brooten’s Love Between
Women)
October __________ Week 7
Tu 3 Carolyn Dinshaw,
“Good Vibrations: John/Eleanor, Dame Alys, the Pardoner, and Foucault”
(from Getting Medieval) Karras and Boyd, “ ‘Ut cum muliere’: A Male
Transvestite Prostitute in Fourteenth-Century London” Karma Lochrie,
“Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell: Murderous Plots and Medieval
Secrets” Thomas Stehling, “To Love a Medieval Boy” Simon Gaunt,
“Straight Minds/“Queer” Wishes in Old French Hagiography” Kathy
Lavezzo, “Sobs and Sighs Between Women” __________ Week 8
Tu
10 Thomas Laquer, Making Sex Patricia Parker, “Gender Ideology, Gender
Change: The Case of Marie Germain” __________ Week 9
Tu
17 James Saslow, “Homosexuality in the Renaissance” Giovanni Dall’Orto,
“Socratic Love” Guy Poirier, “Masculinities and Homosexualities…”
Joseph Cady, “ ‘Masculine Love,’ Renaissance Writing, and the ‘New
Invention’ of Homosexuality” Cady, “Renaissance Awareness and
Language for Heterosexuality: ‘Love’ and ‘Feminine Love’” Luis Mott,
“Portuguese Pleasures”
__________ Week 10
Tu 24 Randolph
Trumbach, “The Birth of the Queen” Trumbach, “Sex, Gender, and Sexual
Identity in Modern Culture” Roy Porter, “Is Foucault Useful for
Understanding Eighteenth and Nineteenth Century Sexuality?” Michel
Rey, “Parisian Homosexuals Create a Lifestyle” Alan Bray,
“Homosexuality and the Signs of Male Friendship” Rousseau, “The Pursuit
of Homosexuality in the Eighteenth Century” __________ Week
11
Tu 31 Trumbach, “London’s Sapphists” Valerie Traub, “The
(In)Significance of ‘Lesbian’ Desire” Traub, “The Perversion of
‘Lesbian’ Desire” Lisa Moore, “ ‘Something More Tender Still Than
Friendship’ ” Liz Stanley, “Epistemological Issues in Researching
Lesbian History” Terry Castle, “A Polemical Introduction” Judith
Butler, “Imitation and Gender
Insubordination”
November __________ Week 12
Tu 7
Giovannia Bianchi, The True History and Adventures of Catherine
Vizzani Anonymous, Love Letters Between a Certain Late Nobleman and
the Famous Mr. Wilson Michael Kimmel, “ ‘Greedy Kisses’ and ‘Melting
Extasy’ ” David Greenberg, “The Socio-Sexual Milieu of the
Love-Letters” Trumbach, “Sodomy Transformed” __________ Week
13
Tu 14 James Creech, Closet Writing/Gay Reading Drafts of
papers due (for those handing in drafts) __________ Week
14
Tu 21 Workshop on class papers __________ Week
15
Tu 28 Harry Oosterhuis, “Medical Science and the Modernization
of Sexuality” Frederik Silverstolpe, “Benkert Was Not a
Doctor” Jeffery Weekes, article still to be determined Hubert
Kennedy, Ulrichs
December __________ Week 16
Tu 5
Rictor Norton, The Myth of the Modern Homosexual Carolyn Dinshaw,
“Touching on the Past” Lisa Duggan, “The Discipline
Problem” Sedgwick, “Introduction: Axiomatic” Halperin, “How do the
History of Male Homosexuality” Richlin, “The Ethnographer’s
Dilemma”
If you have appropriate syllabi, please contact CLGH chair Karen Krahulik at Karen_Krahulik@brown.edu. |